Interesting; I wonder, if the content is of good quality - do people care who/what have produced it? I would say, mostly not; it remains to be seen what/who is valued by most humans the most in this context - humans or machines
Yes. Like the other commenter in OP's link said, I avoid AI like the plague.
I lose all interest once I find out that it's machine generated.
I feel that we're slowly reaching a turning point at which people will get tired of the averaged-out slop and crave something that feels eccentric, new and unforeseen.
And we'll (hopefully) have a new era of artists filling that demand.
At least, this is what I wish the future holds for us.
Why should I listen to AI slop that I could've easily prompted up myself on a rainy Thursday afternoon?
Interesting; I wonder, if the content is of good quality - do people care who/what have produced it? I would say, mostly not; it remains to be seen what/who is valued by most humans the most in this context - humans or machines
Yes. Like the other commenter in OP's link said, I avoid AI like the plague.
I lose all interest once I find out that it's machine generated.
I feel that we're slowly reaching a turning point at which people will get tired of the averaged-out slop and crave something that feels eccentric, new and unforeseen.
And we'll (hopefully) have a new era of artists filling that demand.
At least, this is what I wish the future holds for us.
Why should I listen to AI slop that I could've easily prompted up myself on a rainy Thursday afternoon?
> I think that people who are still referring to all AI-generated content as AI slop are probably lazy luddites
talk about flooding the zone with shit. It couldn't possibly refer to the mind-numbingly bland and unoriginal nature of AI generated content.